Milo Antaeus · free tool · no signup

Your SaaS stack has $500-$5000/mo of hidden waste. Here's how much.

SMBs running 5-15 paid SaaS subscriptions without a recent review carry 15-30% redundancy — duplicate tools, paid seats for departed teammates, annual plans that auto-renewed, premium tiers used at free-tier volume (Vendr 2025, Productiv SaaS Management Index). Plug in your stack size, spend, team, and review recency. See your triage score, three specific things to cut, and the dollar amount you're overpaying.

SMB ownersSolo foundersIndie hackersNo signupBrowser-only
Run the calculator See the $97 audit

This is an estimator using industry benchmarks, not a promise. The math is transparent (see "How this calculator works" below) so you can pressure-test it against your real numbers.

SaaS bill triage calculator

Estimated hidden waste in your SaaS stack
$0/mo
$0 / year
Green
Estimated waste percentage: —

How the triage score works

Base waste % starts at 15% (Vendr/Productiv floor for any SMB stack) and adjusts up for: stacks larger than ~10 tools (+3-8%), teams of 6+ without SaaS governance (+2-5%), no review in 6 months (+5-10%), annual-locked plans (+3% — you can't cancel mid-cycle but you stop the bleed at renewal), and stage friction (early-stage stacks accumulate trial-tier upgrades that never get downgraded).

What you can actually cut

The audit categories that produce 80% of recoverable spend for SMBs: departed-teammate seats (still billed monthly), duplicate tools (two project trackers, two email tools), premium-tier features unused (paying for SAML SSO on a 3-person team), annual plans you forgot (auto-renewed at full retail without negotiation), and trial-tier upgrades that became permanent.

What the calculator does NOT account for

Switching costs. Migrating off a tool you've been on for 3 years has real cost (data export, team retraining, integration rebuilds). The waste number is the gross savings; net savings depends on whether you can actually move. The $97 audit explicitly flags switching-cost risk per recommendation so you don't optimize on paper and create a real-world mess.

Paid next step — $97 SaaS Stack Audit

If the calculator says you're wasting $300+/month, the audit pays for itself in the first cycle. What you get for $97:

What you get

What you do not get

Delivery: 3 business days from receipt of access. Single fixed payment of $97. No subscriptions, no upsells.

Get the SaaS Stack Audit — $97

Where the numbers come from

Treat outside benchmarks as directional, not guaranteed. The calculator deliberately exposes its methodology so you can pressure-test it against your real stack.

How this calculator works (full methodology)

The triage score is a multiplicative model on top of an industry-baseline waste percentage:

  • Base waste: 15% (Vendr/Productiv floor — any non-actively-managed SMB stack carries this much redundancy)
  • Stack size adjustment: +0% at <5 tools, +3% at 6-10, +6% at 11-15, +10% at 16+ (more tools = more overlap and forgotten subscriptions)
  • Review recency: +0% if reviewed in 6 mo, +8% if not (the largest single driver — unreviewed stacks compound waste)
  • Team size: +0% solo, +2% (2-5), +4% (6-15), +6% (16+) — larger teams have more departed-seat risk and less individual ownership of cost
  • Stage: solo +2% (trial-tier sprawl), early +1%, growth 0%, scale -2% (mature companies often have governance)
  • Billing mix: annual -2% (locked in but cheaper per month), monthly +0%, mixed +0%
  • Cap: 45% maximum waste — beyond that, the calculator caps because real-world recoverable waste rarely exceeds half of total spend

Output dollar amount = monthly_spend × final_waste_pct. Health label thresholds: <15% Green, 15-29% Yellow, 30%+ Red.

The full formula is in the page source — view it, fork it, run it against your real data.

Why a calculator and not a sales pitch

If the number this page produces is small for your business, the right answer is to not buy. The calculator uses your inputs instead of hard-coding a vendor-flattering result. That is the non-slimy version of lead generation: give the math away, let the number make the decision.