Redacted sample · Not a customer result · No live payment proof claimed

Sample Launch Safety Audit

This redacted sample is based on a local dogfood run and manually rewritten to remove internal paths and secret-like values. It is not a customer result.

High — Local payment/webhook harness exists, but live processor proof is absent

Evidence: the local Stripe webhook handler exists and the current harness has a passing local store API suite, including valid signature, stream-body, idempotency, transient retry, and negative-revenue refund cases.

Why it matters: a passing local webhook harness reduces false confidence, but it is still not evidence that a live checkout path is configured, reachable, or receiving processor events.

Recommendation: verify payment attempt, completion, refund, and negative-revenue events through owner-visible processor/webhook/log evidence before claiming checkout readiness or revenue.

High — Intake must reject secrets and abuse before queueing fulfillment

Evidence: sample sensitive strings are represented only as [REDACTED_SECRET]. The intended flow rejects API keys, cookies, private keys, payment credentials, customer data, bank details, CAPTCHA/2FA bypass, scraping, account takeover, malware, exfiltration, and KYC bypass requests.

Recommendation: prove the live intake handler rejects unsafe submissions with no payment, no queue, no customer-visible promise, and no fulfillment side effects.

Info — Payment UI is not payment evidence

Evidence: checkout copy or payment buttons can exist while payment attempts and completions remain zero.

Recommendation: keep funnel stages separate: page live → traffic → CTA → payment attempt → payment complete → fulfillment.

What this proves

What this does not prove